Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Ok, first of all, what’s with the “Don’t dare (this or that)”?
We are all entitled to our opinion.
Secondly, it isn’t everyone else’s fault that Regina turned out the way she did.
She is not an innocent victim.
She’s a big girl who made her own decisions.
She may have been manipulated along the way, but, bottom line, she chose to do the things she did.
She could have stopped at any time.
She was selfish and out for revenge and killed people to get it.
She probably does love Henry.
Then again, she loved her father, too.[adrotate group="5"]Yeah, if Gold had documents on Cinderella’s baby, they would probably be just like the ‘extensive’ records he keeps in his shop – like the one on Michael Tillman….it was a blank piece of paper.
Legal adoptions require an extensive background check and probably at least one visit to the prospective adoptor’s home.
That wasn’t possible in Regina’s case.
I seriously doubt Regina wanted that kind of attention.
Look how she reacted to Kurt and Owen being in SB.As far as the curse being broken and Regina being able to call authorities on the Charmings, NO she can’t.
There is no record of Storybrooke, Regina, Snow, David, etc.
Regina would have a lot of explaining to do if she did call the real world authorities.Regina is Henry’s legal mother, and she very well could take this to court and get her son back, and have the whole Charming family arrested, because it’s actually like they kidnapped Henry.
There is no way Regina went through legal channels to adopt Henry.
She’ the Evil Queen from the Enchanted Forest.
She didn’t exist in our world.
She became the Mayor of a town (frozen in time) that also didn’t exist in our world.Legal= paperwork.
Regina wouldn’t have been able to fill out the most basic of information like phone # and address, because Storybrooke didn’t exist.When Owen brought the police to the town line, they couldn’t even see Storybrooke, let alone have authority over it and/or uphold any laws.
I think the Blue Fairy has her own agenda.
I think she wanted the Dark Curse to be cast and ultimately broken.
She didn’t do much, but she manipulated certain situations and/or anticipated certain people’s reations and used it to her benefit.Morraine tells Bae that Reul Ghorm is an ancient being – the original power that rules the ‘night’.
When Bae asks her, “Bigger than my Papa…or worse?” She answers “Bigger than anything”.Blue tends to be ambiguous wheneverever she says anything.
When she meets with Bae, she says “There are two kinds of magic – good magic and dark magic – I am on the right side”.I would consider Neal a major character mainly because he’s actually Bae.
Bae is the reason for everything Rumple did – starting with deserting the Ogre’s War -every deal, every manipulation – Bae is the reason the curse was cast in the first place.
The entire plot of the show centers around Bae.
He’s Rumplestiltskin’s son.
He’s Henry’s father.
He’s the Savior’s one true love (albeit, ‘ex’ one true love, at this point).We don’t know for sure that he wasn’t Pan or a Lost Boy. Adam and Eddy are tricky about their wordings.
Absolutley. They are very careful with their wording.
They said when it comes to ‘Neal’, no one has gotten it right.
And they’re right.
Neal is not PP.
That doesn’t mean Bae wasn’t PP.
In Manhattan, Henry says to Emma “No Baelfire” and Emma says “That’s an alias that wouldn’t fly.”
I think that was a clue to the fact that once Bae took on his alias – Neal Cassady – he was no longer PP.Not a bad theory.
However, it doesn’t explain the fact that Bae is approx 285 yrs old and didn’t age.
Not aging isn’t associated with Oz, it’s associated with Neverland.Actually, you get an A for effort 🙂
Some of the comparisons to LOST were kind of interesting to read, even if they were just the author’s view point or not 🙂I fully agree with RumplesGirl.
I did click on the link and read a good amount of it.
Some of it can be considered LOST nods, I guess.
Most of it, imo, is the author’s view point.While the ‘Tamara’ connections that were quoted are interesting, I don get the connection to the show or the connection to LOST.
I don’t think Tamara is Pocahontas simply because Pocahontas was not an evil murderer 🙂
Yeah, I’m a huge LOST fan.
I got all the LOST referrences in the show.
But, I agree with RumplesGirl, I don’t get the connection here, either.I think Tamara’s identity is as simple as – she was in the orphanage with August (and, possibly, so was Greg).
They stressed that her name is pronounced ‘tomorrow’.
That made me think of ‘Little Orphan Annie’.
Not that I think that’s who she is, just that it’s a nod at an ‘orphan/orphanage’ clue.There are a few other ‘Orphan Annie’ clues:
In the 30’s, Orphan Annie was a popular radio show.
Quaker Oats took over as sponsor and introduced a new character – Captain Sparks (taser?).
Quaker Oats Co. is in Carlisle, PA (Greg mentions Carlisle, PA).
Orphan Annie was also a popular comic strip in a UK newspaper – “The Daily Mirror”.
