Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
The OUAT panel is at 11 am PDT: Here’s a conversion of when to expect pictures to start to appear:
San Diego – at 11:00:0 AM
Virginia – at 2:00:00 PM (for us East Coasters)
Missouri – at 1:00:00 PM
London – at 7:00:00 PM
France – at 8:00:00 PM
And if you’re on the east coast of Australia, the WL panel starts at 3:15am and the OUAT panel ends at 4:45am. Guess who won’t be getting to bed until 6am at the absolute earliest, (maybe more like 7am if there’s juicy new info to be discussed and vids to be watched and pics to swoon over).
[adrotate group="5"](ETA that it’s annoying when you try to quote two people at the same time now. Gave up and just quoted one instead.)
]Just a thought, didn’t Bae wash up by some sort of lake in FTL. Perhaps this tweet refers to events in present day FTL involving Bae (The B?) and MAP?
He landed near the Safe Haven, which I believe is the coastline next to the ocean. But many believe that Lake Nostos will be involved in his revival somehow. Could also be involved in him getting out of FTL. So I’m liking the possibility that “(L)AKE” could be referring to Nostos.
As for the bottom line, I’m still sticking with that being “H_ _ _ TO.” You’ve gotta look really closely at the very bottom of the pic, but there’s a teeny tiny hint of a mark right next to the T, so there’s another letter there. If we’re going with this idea of them using Lake Nostos in some way, and if the lines are connected, I could see the mystery word being “HELP” like Josephine suggested.
Anyone know if the ABCOnce Twitter is going to Live Tweet it? Or if WetPaint or SpoilerTV has a person there? I’m 100% sure that OUAF does, so we should be stalking them for the panels. Twitter and Tumblr are our best friends tomorrow, guys.
Thank God for the internets and social media!
I have to admit that I’m looking forward to him most of all. We’ve seen all the others at panels before, either at Comic-Con or Paleyfest. MRJ is a wildcard. I’m hoping they sit him right next to Bobby. I want to see them interact and how much chemistry they have. It seems that he really gets along well with the cast.
Yes, I’m really excited to see Nealfire discussion at a Panel event like this for the first time! And I wanna kiss MRJ for saying he’ll tweet updates.
Also…I’d pay good money for Colin to actually wear a Catwoman costume on stage. 😆
I think that Sidney has the best chance of being connected with Wonderland of all the characters with what we know of the show.
Yeah, given the Genie connection with Cyrus, I’d say he’s a pretty safe bet for a connection to the WL show. Also, the fact that he spent some time living as a looking glass could be a fun little bonus connection to WL too. However they write his comeback, I hope it’s more than just one cameo scene.
To change that would seem that they are putting in a gay couple for the sake of it.
Agreed. And a gay couple shouldn’t be there just for the sake of attempting to be politically correct, because that’s just a slap in the face to the whole issue. RedBeauty shippers do have the view that Red can still qualify as the “Beast”, which is fair enough, and Red doesn’t traditionally have a true love. But Belle is famously straight and her Beast is famously male and with relationships that iconic, messing with their gender would land them in hot water because viewers want to see that romance play out as they know it. For all that they’ve twisted for their version of B&B, at its core, it’s essentially still the same, familiar romance.
Does anybody know what time the panel discussion starts tomorrow?
WL Panel is 10:15 – 11:00.
OUAT Panel is 11:00 – 11:45.Love how we are analyzing handwriting and everything! lol
This is what we’re reduced to when there’s a spoiler drought. *sigh*
Swear I can hear a faint voice in the distance singing, “Pooooooor unfooooortunaaaaate soooouuuuuulllls,” (and then it starts cackling about how they know all the Little Mermaid storyline spoilers that we’d gladly make a desperate and hasty deal to get our hands on).
As far as Ginny’s Twitter incident, she actually addresses it in this interview:
http://hollywoodlife.com/2013/02/07/once-upon-a-time-spoilers-snow-charming-relationship-ginnifer-goodwin-interview/I made a comment — purely trying to be funny — that most likely, at 8 o’clock on a sunday night, we’re not going to show a grandmother-granddaughter makeout scenario. I got into a lot of trouble for making that comment. People thought I was being homophobic, but really, I’m just not into incest. In defense of my character, I’m not into the idea of my daughter making out with my stepmother who tried to kill me several times.”
So, basically, she was just saying that looking at the situation from Snow’s perspective, there are plenty of reasons that SQ shouldn’t happen. Which is a fair enough opinion if you put yourself in Snow’s shoes. The fact that they’re both women isn’t what Ginny had an issue with at all.
I guess I just don’t see anything homophobic in his original tweet. Chauvanistic? Sure, he coulda worded things better, (or not commented at all), but he ultimately admitted that and apologised.
But really all he did was state the fact that Disney wasn’t necessarily likely to grant permission for an openly gay couple to be front and centre on one of their primetime, family shows. Which is probably pretty true. It shouldn’t be true, but it’s not David Anders’ fault that that social stigma is in place and ABC and Disney would probably get heat for showing it, so they might shy away from it. Perhaps he even said the original comment out of frustration over the situation himself. He’s not shy about voicing his opinion if he thinks something is full of crap.
Yes, it’s a sad state of affairs that the LGBT community is treated, perceived and represented at all differently to the straight community, because they shouldn’t be. People are people, love is love, everyone should be equal with the same rights, and I can only imagine the frustration that LGBT people feel over not being fairly represented, so yes, that comment someone sent him was very telling and sad. Hopefully there’ll be a day in the not too distant future where there will no longer be a stigma attached to it, but I say again, it’s not David’s fault that the stigma exists and that it affects the choices of his bosses, which IMO is all he was getting at with that original comment.
As for what his friends would think, well if they’re friends of his and have spent time with him, I’m guessing they’re likely accustomed to the way he expresses himself, so they likely wouldn’t take it personally. Perhaps he should be more mindful that all his Twitter followers don’t know him as well on a personal level, and things are very easily misinterpreted online, especially when you only have 140 characters.
Look, I’m no raging David Anders’ fangirl. Have only ever seen a couple of things he’s been in. I just feel that terms like “homophobe” and “bigot” shouldn’t be thrown around lightly. Dislike him for being tasteless and crass with some of his comments if you wish, I can certainly see why people would be put off by the way he speaks sometimes. Anyone is well within their rights to consider him sleazy if that’s how you see him. But judging by what I’ve seen of him, he doesn’t strike me as being a mean spirited person who finds joy in belitting and offending people for who they are by spouting hate, so IMO calling him those names is unfair. That’s all.
