Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 12, 2013 at 10:19 pm in reply to: "OUAT creators promise to ‘tame the beast’ next season" #198134
RumplesGirl
KeymasterGreat interview!
[adrotate group="5"]"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"RumplesGirl
KeymasterGrumpy makes the most sense as sheriff. He was head of Snow’s personal guard in FTL.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"RumplesGirl
KeymasterI think Gypsy’s point is that with shows like OUAT, anyone would be confused if they started midseason. OUAT isn’t like a cop procedural, like Law and Order or Bones, where every episode is a stand alone and doesn’t connect to the previous. With OUAT there is a huge mythology and each episode is connected to the season and story as a whole.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"RumplesGirl
KeymasterConversely, the definition of “canon” is apparently up for debate. I agree within the show that anyone proven as TL is canon: IE: Snowing, RumBelle, Cinderella/Thomas, Phillip/Aurora. Not sure about the “will never change” aspect of the definition because some couples are canon in that they were together on the show for however long, though that may change (with the exception of anyone proven as TL).
Re: the “will never change” bit, that is in reference to those proven to be TL. We do not have any kind of proof that Milah was Hook’s true love, for example. The only way to prove that is by breaking a curse. They are canon in the sense that they were together for a time period and have a story line, but they are not canon (in my brain) in the sense that Hook will not love again.
Again this is why–when I wrote this definition–I called it highly contentious and tried to make specific but said until A and E show us it, it’s not canon."He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"RumplesGirl
Keymaster@MysteryKat25 wrote:
@RumplesGirl wrote:
I’m actually fairly certain that is Kranen, who started this topic…
Phee meant who asked the question on twitter & got Carly & Adam to respond, giving us clarification so we don’t spend weeks trying to fit her into the OUAT world when she isn’t a part of it.
right. I’m fairly certain Tyler James IS Kranen here on our forums who started this topic.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"RumplesGirl
KeymasterHere guys.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"RumplesGirl
KeymasterI would totally vote for her.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"RumplesGirl
KeymasterI think that’s why A and E are calling them the Lost Ones instead of the Lost Boys, they are aging the entire myth so that they can cast older people.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"RumplesGirl
KeymasterI hate that line. I hate it. That entire speech of his needs to be completely wiped from that episode.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"RumplesGirl
KeymasterThat line is so frustratingly opaque! Gah. It could mean
These (multiple) hundred years (meaning more than one century)OR it could mean
These (singluar) hundred years (meaning only one century)
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love" -
AuthorPosts