Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
What? She’s just been accused of murdering someone AND interrogated and later on visited again not just by a sheriff but the whole Charming family – hello?
Ok so we’ve switched POVs. I was talking about from Emma’s POV and now you’re talking about Regina’s. So from Regina’s POV I totally get WHY she did what she did… but it was still wrong. I understand there’s fear in her doing the things she’s done. Defense and all that. But, it’s still not OK to go flinging the sheriff of the town across the yard. Even if you’re upset. Even if she threatened to take your son away. It’s still wrong. And it wasn’t really unprofessional for them all to be there. Emma is the sheriff, David seems to be the deputy, and Snow is actually Regina’s stepdaughter so.. what’s unprofessional? heh
that she wouldn’t be allowed to see HER OWN SON.
yeah, I know. That usually happens to people who have done bad things. Murderers get put in jail and they don’t see their kids. The law isn’t the regular law in SB and jail isn’t like regular jail in SB. I get that. But, it’s the same principle. Regina is suspect number 1 in a murder with two witnesses (I really do think they’re using Pongo as a witness, I know.. its no Law and Order…). She’s dangerous. Yeah, she’s not going to be able to see her son for a little bit. Things need to change and Henry’s safety needs to be priority. That doesn’t mean it’s going to be like that forever.
I’m not excusing her for creating the curse in the first place but to me, she’s not really guilty of Henry’s coma.
I’m sorry but that entire paragraph after the quote is completely moot and pointless. It doesn’t matter if she thought her kid would eat sweets or go to Emma’s or whatever… she made a poisoned dessert where he could have access to it. It doesn’t matter if she thought he’d eat it or not… she made it happen. She made it. She attempted to poison someone. That is bad. Very bad. And his condition is solely her fault. Because if she never made it he never would have fell victim to it.
[adrotate group="5"]I’m not, It’s about Emma this time and how she crossed the line she shouldn’t.
What line?
When she said that Regina couldn’t go anywhere near Henry? Good for her!
From what Emma knows and has seen Regina just murdered someone! One of Henry’s only friends. She just used magic on Emma and flung her across the yard. The girl cannot control her temper. Dam right someone needs to take Henry away from Regina. She can’t control herself, she has bad impulses, her temper is horrible, and she has a seriously violent past. Yeah, girl should be stripped of her parental rights and should only see Henry on supervised visits. Any sane and responsible adult would do that.
Even if Emma wasn’t there, Henry needs to be removed from Regina’s care. It’s just not smart or safe for him to be there. Some might say “Oh but Regina would never harm Henry.” But the thing is… she already did. He was poisoned because of her. He actually died because of her. That alone is enough reason for Regina to lose her rights to have anything other than supervised visits with Henry.
edit: It doesn’t matter that Regina didn’t mean for Henry to eat the poisoned turnover. The fact that it was there is the problem. As in.. ya know, the attempted murder/sleeping curse of someone. That’s just not a good thing to do. Not very excusable. She also didn’t ensure that her son wouldn’t eat it. Knowing that her son goes to Emma’s apartment and has probably eaten there many times and knowing more than likely they would say goodbye… Regina didn’t make sure that Henry accidentally got a piece of that turnover. Irresponsible. Endangering the child’s life.
It could be a file she created on herself. As in, she found everything she could about herself as a baby, etc to find more about her parents. I don’t think it was necessarily her foster system file, but a case file she created on herself.
And I don’t think August planted the article so Emma would find it… that seems silly and pointless for him to do that. It’s just something she found on her own.
I think the article that says no leads is when Emma was a baby so August was only a kid… Doubt he wrote the article.
Did Emma actually say she was emancipated or just out of the system by 16? Because she could have just run away.
I could see it as a season 3 episode. Maybe Emma was a serious handful when she was young (and always)? Obviously that is absolutely no excuse to just toss a kid aside. I bet you the fact that she was sent back because they had their own kid has done more damage to her than anything else that happened to her (and there’s a lot that’s happened to her).
Before she knew who her parents were she could always say about them abandoning her because they didn’t want kids or they couldn’t take care of her or they were young and stupid etc. But how do you excuse someone sending you away when you’re 3? Because they had their own biological child? Yowch. That must have created some serious self-worth issues.
But yeah, I wanna know what kind of kid Emma was.
I would love to have an episode where it flashed back to a very young Emma.
But yeah, what Gypsy said – she got her last name from the first family she was with until she was 3. I want to see what these people are like. Because how can you take care of a little girl for years and then just give her back because you had one of your own? I mean… did they not connect with her at all? They were there probably for her first steps, first words… how do you just give a kid away like that?
I thought that Snow thought Daniel had run away and left Regina because she (Snow) told Cora about it. So, I always thought that until the apple incident, Snow blamed herself for Regina’s unhappiness because she thought she was at fault for Daniel running away.
If Neal got mad at Emma for giving Henry up for adoption, I would love to see Emma’s reaction. Pay for it really. Because she will give him the ass chewing of a lifetime and then a serious beatdown.
You know, there’s a difference between abandoning your children (Milah, Rump) and adoption. Or, in Snow’s case, only best chance.
It would be interesting if Neal was Bae because even how they were left to be alone is polar opposites. Bae was abandoned. Truly abandoned. First by his mother Milah. And then his father by not going with him. Both parents chose what was best for them instead of their child. Milah chose a life of adventure over her son. Rump chose power (and fear) over his son. But Emma was “abandoned” because her parents tried to do what was best for her.
And Emma did the same thing with Henry. Any reasonable, sane person would realize that Emma giving Henry away was what was best for him. If she didn’t put him up for adoption her baby would be 2 months old when she got out of prison and she had no job, no money, no place to live, no family, no friends, nowhere to go… how would she take care of a baby? More than likely Emma lived in the back of that bug for quite awhile until she got herself enough money to find a real place. Can you imagine Henry living in the backseat of that bug with her?
So yeah, if Neal gets upset about her giving up the baby… I’d love to see that throwdown.
