Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Actually, I believe he only remembered everything once he heard Emma’s name said aloud. Before then, he had no recollection. So technically, he would lose all his memories as well if he leaves now.
[adrotate group="5"]I for one quite enjoyed this episode. More than last week’s.
Really liked seeing more Regina’s backstory. Kinda filled in the gap between Daniel’s death and her evil reign ten years later. So she really didn’t want to become like her mother right after, but was rather consumed by evil power, kinda like Rumpel. It seems to be a theme/pattern with the villains. Quite tragic. 🙁
One question, though, that I think hasn’t been answered yet (I really didn’t want to start a new thread for it)– Rumpel was planning on leaving, presumably to find his son, right? So , my question is: why was he so hellbent on bringing magic to storybrooke in the first place? If he left, he wouldn’t be bringing the magic with him, naturally…was he planning on returning with Bae? Or staying out for good? And if he was not planning on returning, then again, WHY bring magic and have it be contained in the town? Gah. I’m stumped. Am I missing something? 😆
@Surayya wrote:
Another regular casting call for a one Barrett.
Wow, that description does sound eerily like a Bae-like character. Then there’s the name…could all very well be [yet another] red herring, though. So I won’t start celebrating…yet. I am intrigued, though.
I actually think I’m in the minority. I’m pretty sure everyone–both outside and inside the forum–really likes the idea of Bae being Henry’s dad. I certainly don’t, and I have delineated my reasons in other threads.
One thing to note–it was mentioned earlier that the writers claimed we would be finding out what happened to Baelfire in this season, though they didn’t necessarily say we’d actually meet him or see his face. What does everyone think? Am I just splitting hairs or could the clever word choice have significance? I don’t know how we’d find out more about the character without actually re-introducing him officially, but I wouldn’t put it past the writers to work some magic (no pun intended).
Also, it’s interesting that they specifically said we would be finding out what happened to him. Well, we do know, to a certain extent, what happened. He got thrown into this world. We just haven’t seen him yet. Unless…something else happened to Bae?…
Yes, I am still grasping at the neverland theory. I want it to be true, dang flabbit. 😆
@hjbau wrote:
Well i sort of think that Rumpel is the same man before and after. He is a coward before and he is a coward after. He just has power after so he can cause more damage then before.
You mean damage “before” the curse? No, he never caused any damage then. and there is absolutely NO canon to prove it.
I don’t think that it is because he is cursed that makes him evil, but that he has this power and he can do almost anything with it.
It’s clearly suggested in the show that IT IS the curse that turned him from good-to-evil, so I don’t understand your views. In the end, though, every one chooses to believe what they want and see what they want to see in certain characters. I’d just appreciate it if fans would base their *opinions* (because in the end, they’re just that) more on what’s shown in canon. 🙄
And Cherish, that’s an interesting theory, and It would be a cool twist. However, I still think it was Rumpel-the-croc (wonder how they’re going to pull that off) who bit off Hook’s hand. Everything in recent synopses seem to suggest it.
@Josephine wrote:
Maybe Belle goes for another “walk” and discovers Gaston walking around Storybrooke with a pegleg. He tells her the last thing he remembers is standing in Rumple’s doorway, and she gets angry. 😛
I’m sorry, but this just sent me into a fit of giggles. 😆
Anywho, this whole Belle’s-undoing plot sounds very intriguing. I do wonder what will happen. It’s anybody guess, but I think it might be a break from her storyline with Gold/Rumpel. Perhaps she will have her own mystery/plot…I don’t doubt it might be connected to Hook.
@Surayya wrote:
Well we meet Henry's Dad in Ep 6 – it's just been confirmed by K&H!!! So we shall at least know if he’s Henry’s dad or not 😉
Awesome. Now all that’s left to know is how soon Baelfire will be making his re-appearance. Can anybody dig up the transcript where the writers state that Bae would definitely come back in season 2? Was there any tip-off that he would be coming back early or later on in the season? I’m just trying to put two and two together. 😆
@malchore wrote:
Actually that whole “Alice in Wonderland” episode tossed me into a bizzaro world. That was a completely different realm from the Enchanted Forest (FTL.) So how did Regina’s curse extend into a different realm? AND pull in exactly one person from that realm? That’s one of about a dozen outstanding brain twisters from season 1 waiting for an explanation.
Yea, that’s stumped me as well. The more I think about it, the more of a plot hole I think it is. Wonderland really shouldn’t have been affected by the curse…like, at all. Does that mean that some place like Neverland, another “realm” altogether as well, was also affected? I highly doubt it, since we never met any Neverland characters before, and it does suggest that Hook arrives from the “outside”…no?
@TheGoldenKey wrote:
Peter Pan would travel to the real world and bring children back to Neverland. Emma was an orphan, living in an orphanage. What if Peter traveled there looking for `lost boys`. Bae had a friend Morraine back in FTL. I believe a young Emma would have resembled Morraine in many ways. Perhaps Peter became quite taken with Emma and decided to stay. Perhaps Emma convinced him to stay, just as Wendy attempted to do in the original story. Perhaps he ended up in that same orphanage from 14 on, developed a friendship with Emma that ended in their late teens. That could also bring into play the possibility of Bae, aka Peter Pan, being Henry`s father.
.Wouldn’t that imply that Emma lied to henry completely about how she and the dad met, though? Emma says he was a firefighter and frequented the diner where she worked as a teen–I’m pretty sure she even confirms that’s how they met. If Peter/Bae met Emma in the orphanage, then they did in fact not meet how she described it to Henry.
That’s not to say that the writers could have just had her lie completely and used it as a red herring, but something in me tells me that Emma was partially truthful with her story.
At the end, it’s all fair game. I’ve been pretty vocal about detesting the Bae/father theory, but I’m bracing myself for the worst at this point. If it happens, I want it to be done right.
With all this said and done, I still am hard pressed to believe that the NY stranger is Bae. I just can’t fully buy it (regardless of my dislike of that theory).
