- This topic has 12,956 replies, 132 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 2 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Sounds to me more like they are trying to parallel when Neal received the “Broken” message and chose NOT to do anything about it. Hook will get a message and even though he may have been warned just like Neal by Snow (and previously by August) that it is better to leave Emma alone, Hook will make the right decision and go get her. The interesting plot twist would be if he is being set up.
[adrotate group="5"]Sounds to me more like they are trying to parallel when Neal received the “Broken” message and chose NOT to do anything about it. Hook will get a message and even though he may have been warned just like Neal by Snow (and previously by August) that it is better to leave Emma alone, Hook will make the right decision and go get her. The interesting plot twist would be if he is being set up.
Ohh, I like that one! Ok, I’ll accept that. It was oddly worded so I can understand the ambiguity and reading what you want to read into it but there’s simply no way at this point Hook would intentionally do something to hurt Emma. And I can’t imagine what WW or anyone else would have that would even make Hook pause. If he didn’t take Pan’s deal in 3×5 and he told everyone where Neal was in 3×6 and HELPED Neal in 3×6 and risked his life in 3×11…for Emma…what’s someone going to tempt him with? Riches? He’s got it. Power? He’s captain of his own ship, and I don’t ever remember “World Domination” being on his to-do list. All he wants is Emma. (Getting there!) Acceptance (Won over Daddy Charming!) Family/Sense of Belonging (Hook and Henry are bonding – THAT part of the article wasn’t ambiguous!!)
hmm…I seem to be suddenly quite defensive of my pirate! 🙂
Oh, no – there is NO WAY Hook is going to work with the WW. If what is being implied is true, the only way I can see it happening is if Hook is somehow tricked into it. But I would think it would have to be a really good trick.
Oh, no – there is NO WAY Hook is going to work with the WW. If what is being implied is true, the only way I can see it happening is if Hook is somehow tricked into it. But I would think it would have to be a really good trick.
Agreed.
It could be WW sets it up, so Killian thinks he has to get Emma in order to save her parents/everyone (or so she can at least choose if she wants to help or not). There is no way he’d KNOWINGLY do anything to harm/hurt Emma/Henry/Snowing at this point in time- he’s proven that over & over again- the haters need to build a bridge & deal with it already :/
O.o OHHHH KAAAAYYYY- weird. It showed up as posting my post twice, so I edited it to a gif & now that is gone O.o
Soooo, I’ll start again 😉 Perfect Captain Swan family gif 😀 Our OTP makes me all warm & fuzzy 🙂
from http://lovingcaptainswan.tumblr.com/ (I think!)
Ok, I had to post this from Tumblr because it did make me laugh. And is my exact thoughts on Emma dating life in 3B.
Anonymous asked: I’m sorry but what’s the point of giving Emma a serious boyfriend? He’s not even sticking around. He could have been a friend, why making it a relationship? I think they could have avoided it, especially since we already have a “triangle” with Neal and Hook. Smh. Not to mention that this isn’t even the Emma with her real memories, but she’s living a fake life, she doesn’t even really know this guy. So now what, she’ll have feelings for a third guy? Torn between Hook, Neal, and Walsh? Ridiculous
Cause Emma’s allowed to want a boyfriend??? Cause it is just an added layer of reality to her character??? That she wants a father figure for Henry??? Like I have literally not reason to feel ill towards the whole thing. I even like Walsh more than Neal even though I know he’s going to be a flying monkey.
http://herohook.co.vu/post/78487450044/im-sorry-but-whats-the-point-of-giving-emma-a-serious
Hehe, flying monkey. Seriously, I will be so upset if they don’t make Walsh a flying monkey. I can’t even look at pics of him anymore without thinking ‘monkey’.
The topic ‘The Captain Swan thread!’ is closed to new replies.