Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
[adrotate group="5"]"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"
Indeed! Wow, that is some shoe horning. They could at least be wearing the same outfits. But I guess that’s why Hook remarks it took Regina a long time to do her hair.
This is one of those cases when the writers make their lives more difficult than it needs to be. Unless the blue dress (still my favorite EQ dress, bummed I’m not going to see it again) has been torn apart and is currently another frock, then all they need to do is have Regina wear the blue outfit out in the field meeting Hook and it wouldn’t feel so forced and shoe-horned in.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"Also why not send Henry with Belle in that case? I mean, yeah, his mothers would not agree to it, but…
…but they also wouldn’t have agreed to them taking Henry back when Ingrid was running around, and clearly Rumple wanted Henry out of town then (with him and Belle)
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"Clearly these scenes were written/filmed as if they were happening back to back, because Regina is wearing the same outfit in both and she’s holding onto Hook’s hook. The writers are inserting these new flashbacks where they see fit :
Yeaaaaaaaah. Clearly. Thanks for that. I thought this is where it fit in but wow…sloppy.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"Peek thoughts
#2
Overly dramatic, but LOL to dwarves thinking that they are going to make a difference
#3
“My hook has tasted the blood of dozens.” Wonderful
But…when does this…like…I don’t know…take place?
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"We all get branded, and we’re all being sent to the Underworld
Well that answers that.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"Thanks for posting those but I still think Robin is using “our” in the context of referring to him and Regina. “Against OUR best instincts”…”You can visit with OUR child so long as one of US is present”
Well, but Robin says “her mother” so he recognizes that Zelena is baby Green Bean’s mother. It’s poorly worded but I don’t think Robin is taking away Zelena’s motherhood.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"He’s not. He’s talking to Zelena.
You might be right but I disagree. I think last week he referred to it as “our child” in the context that it was his and Regina’s child.
Nope, I checked the transcript
Robin: “But Regina and I have agreed you are her mother. So against our best instincts, we still have hope for you. So…you can visit with our child as long as one of us is present.”
And video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvivFkpWC2U
(the scene in question begins around 2:10 or so)
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"But last week it was all, “you can hold your kid and we’re going to watch…”
Maybe she’s not talking to Zelena, but talking to Robin. Maybe Regina wants to take the baby away and protect it somewhere with magic and RH doesn’t want to let go of little Baby Hood. It’s best chance is probably with Regina, not RH and his arrows. Maybe.
Maaaaaybe. But usually the stage direction would indicate that. It would have something like:
Regina turns to Robin suddenly
to indicate that she’s not talking to the same person as Robin–and that’s clearly Zelena because Robin is using “our” child, so it’s clearly the WW.
I don’t like how Robin refers to baby greenbean as “our child” as if it is his and Regina’s biologically.
He’s not. He’s talking to Zelena.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"
