Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@ Daniel J Lewis I have to agree, I don’t really care if the numbers they use are LOST Easter eggs or not. In fact, I would love it if they would somehow give OUaT its own kind of “numbers” so its a little more of a piece of its own puzzle rather than a search and find game that remembers another puzzle, know what I mean?
I think OUaT can stand on its own now 😀
[adrotate group="5"]The number 815 was the airline flight in Lost
and the number 108 occurred a couple of times one of those being the six numbers of the people chosen when added up totaled 108. I think it was also the amount of time given in the Swan Hatch on the timer before having to hit the button to keep anything bad from happening.So let’s suppose that not every happy ending is your ending up with someone, then wouldn’t it be better for Red to end up in SB rather than FTL? 1) she has skills and abilities she can use while living there 2) She wouldn’t have to remember what she is and did in FTL. Perhaps her Happily ever after is best not knowing:)
Tongue in cheek: maybe a wolf-man (shrek-like) is her true love and when he kisses her they both become wolves and live happily ever after:)
My favorite seen was when we found out why she wears the red cloak, and that Granny paid a magician for it.
Least favorite has to be when Regina showed up and said she was still David’s emergency contact and chided Emma for being there. She treats everyone like they are children and can’t think for themselves, and then all of them just roll their eyes and do what she says. Just when I thought we might get somewhere… really? In my opinion Emma WAS doing her job!
My first thought was that he was looking for Snow as well. I like the idea that the SB boundary somehow discombobulates the FTL characters or refuses to let them leave without consequences.
I don’t think Regina has the power to remove a heart in the real world. We saw that only in FTL, but we have only seen the huntsman so far. Who’s to say she doesn’t have PC’s heart or SW’s heart or whoever. We certainly have only seen a handful of her interactions. Although, I don’t know if you could feel true love without a heart. That will be a real twist if she has the power to remove hearts in SB. But so far, all I’ve seen in the “real” world is a lot of manipulation and whatever she brought with her from FTL, no supernatural powers for her or Rumpel so far. No moving plants, or poofing into smoke. The FT characters seem bound by the natural laws of our world so far — above ground.
Would Emma’s last name and the Swans on Henry’s light be considered LOST references? What about LOST number references? Henry gets off train at gate 4 in pilot; Clock stuck on 8:15, Regina’s house number 108, eye close ups in 8:15 (Emma) and the Heart is a Lonely Hunter (Graham). Someone figured out there were 108 boxes in the EQ’s heart chamber (9×12), Zoso dagger similar to the dagger used in LOST used to try to kill mother, Jacob and man in black; 23 on strangers motorcycle plate; EQ turns into black smoke; Hansel and Gretel wake up on the ground looking up like happened in several LOST episodes; Emma crashed into a sign with the numbers 4 and 23; In Dreamy sister Astrid says they sold only 42 candles.
http://seriable.com/once-upon-a-time-1-01-pilot-lost-easter-eggs/
I hope it is not Walt Disney. Back when the episode that introduced our stranger aired, I was on abc’s once chat and read a conversation by a supposed son of one of the writer’s who claimed that the stranger is someone we have already seen. Could just be a red herring, but I admit I am kind of hoping for that.
