-
AuthorSearch Results
-
October 19, 2014 at 1:17 am #286074
In reply to: The Captain Swan thread!
surayya
ParticipantI don’t get the chance to come visit for 4 days and I have to backpedal 11 pages! I now have my head wonderfully full of pretties and good discussion!
In regard to the dress – I’m not shocked by the controversy. With some folks in this fandumb, a character can sneeze and people would find a way to twist it into fodder for their anti-whatever agenda. I still love it. Is it completely different than anything we’ve seen Emma in? Yes. But that’s the point. None of the characters on OUAT get the chance to breathe, but many realize you have to enjoy those quiet moments — Emma still hasn’t completely wrapped her head around that thought. But that dress says she’s trying – she’s realizing she has to put herself first sometimes, and allow herself positive experiences to outweigh the difficult ones. So I think the dress is a lovely way to show just how much Emma has grown. Not just in regard to opening herself to a romantic relationship. Her mother, father, and new friend are also there. S1 Emma, if, say Graham had succeeded in getting her to agree to a date, would have shown up in the red leather jacket of armor and I don’t think anyone would know about the date – even her friend, Mary Margaret. But Emma is allowing her parents and friend to be a part of this very huge moment in her life. All of those lessons she’s learned, about family and community and opening up yourself to the good even though the possibility of hurt could sneak in, are finally coming together for Emma.
And I 2nd – 3rd? 4th? 5th? – the comment about CSers understanding Emma’s psychology, and that other shippers’ focus isn’t necessarily Emma (not saying that has to be a bad thing, but I can see, then, why you are devoted to ships that just aren’t happening and frankly, were never going to happen). I see so much SF stuff about family and Henry…which is all well and good but a romantic relationship is not the same thing. Neal and Emma’s responsibilities as parents to their son is one thing – their responsibilities and the way they feel about each other something else entirely. And, yes, they are two different things. I love my son, but my marriage is my relationship with my husband, my family is my relationship with both my son and husband. SQ is a relationship I have more difficulty with. And it’s most certainly NOT because it’s a relationship between two women. (I would love OUAT to explore a same gender relationship, but with two people who love each other, not 2 pieces of canon relationships, or even unrequited love – ie: Aurora and Mulan. But that’s a tangent for a different day/thread!) SQ is the definition of dysfunctional – ALL of Emma’s misery and scars can be traced back to one person – Regina (Ok, some argue not Regina, but Rumple, but I disagree with that assessment.) Regina ripped Emma away from her parents, caused Emma to grow up feeling worthless and alone…and Emma’s supposed to fall in love with Regina? Um…
Luckily, the haters have just reached a point of ridiculousness. I tend to tune out when the whole rape culture thing gets going – and that means arguments made against Hook or Neal and Emma, or Regina and Graham. Because I think it takes reading a LOT into these situations to go from what we’ve been shown and running around in circles shouting “RC! RC! RC!” And I don’t believe it was ever A&E’s intention to suggest any of these relationships were about rape. Studying this topic in college (Communications major, focus on film/tv theory here) there was one example that was always brought up – General Hospital and the marriage of Luke and Laura (and god, am I dating myself here – but I was only 2 when the actual event was shown on tv!!). If you don’t know the reference, long story short Luke raped (like actual rape, not innuendo or heart-stealing-so-she-was-a-rapist nonsense) Laura…then they fell in love, got married and had a couple of kids. And when the marriage was shown on tv, it broke viewership records. People were OBSESSED with Luke and Laura. The whole he raped her bit pretty much got swept under the rug. This is NOT what we’re seeing in OUAT between any of the characters. So as I have huge problems with my Luke & Laura example, I also have huge problems with people throwing around terms like ‘rape’ and ‘rape culture’ or even ‘stalker’, etc in regard to any of the OUAT characters – because 1) nothing has been established in canon and 2) Rape, and ‘rape culture’ is far to important a topic to use it as part of an agenda to denounce or support your favorite fictional characters on a tv show. Sorry – enough of that – end rant!
Onto more positive topics before I end my novel here (hey, 3 days away, right?!
) as far as our dear couple goes, I’m loving what we’re getting. Not much is particularly surprising (I refer you back to the ‘we understand these characters’ comments previously brought up) but it is all very in line with what I expect from this couple. One step forward, 2 steps back. Hook supporting Emma, Emma admitting she’s afraid to lose him (HOW HUGE IS THAT?!) – and hopefully, as many suspect, an identity crisis with Hook and Emma taking on the role of supporter in their relationship. I’m still a little on the fence with EM/Ice Queen but I’m loving the Frozen stuff. Almost all of Kristoff’s stuff in the last episode had me either cracking up or squeeing over his attempts to handle his handful of a soon-to-be sister-in-law! And this episode – I think it just might kill us all!! Bring it on – less than 24 hours now!!!
Welcome back Jenna 🙂 & Agree with everything you’ve just said *hands over hooky cookie & rum cake*
[adrotate group="5"]October 19, 2014 at 12:54 am #286072In reply to: The Captain Swan thread!
Jenna_B
ParticipantI don’t get the chance to come visit for 4 days and I have to backpedal 11 pages! I now have my head wonderfully full of pretties and good discussion! 🙂
In regard to the dress – I’m not shocked by the controversy. With some folks in this fandumb, a character can sneeze and people would find a way to twist it into fodder for their anti-whatever agenda. I still love it. Is it completely different than anything we’ve seen Emma in? Yes. But that’s the point. None of the characters on OUAT get the chance to breathe, but many realize you have to enjoy those quiet moments — Emma still hasn’t completely wrapped her head around that thought. But that dress says she’s trying – she’s realizing she has to put herself first sometimes, and allow herself positive experiences to outweigh the difficult ones. So I think the dress is a lovely way to show just how much Emma has grown. Not just in regard to opening herself to a romantic relationship. Her mother, father, and new friend are also there. S1 Emma, if, say Graham had succeeded in getting her to agree to a date, would have shown up in the red leather jacket of armor and I don’t think anyone would know about the date – even her friend, Mary Margaret. But Emma is allowing her parents and friend to be a part of this very huge moment in her life. All of those lessons she’s learned, about family and community and opening up yourself to the good even though the possibility of hurt could sneak in, are finally coming together for Emma.
And I 2nd – 3rd? 4th? 5th? – the comment about CSers understanding Emma’s psychology, and that other shippers’ focus isn’t necessarily Emma (not saying that has to be a bad thing, but I can see, then, why you are devoted to ships that just aren’t happening and frankly, were never going to happen). I see so much SF stuff about family and Henry…which is all well and good but a romantic relationship is not the same thing. Neal and Emma’s responsibilities as parents to their son is one thing – their responsibilities and the way they feel about each other something else entirely. And, yes, they are two different things. I love my son, but my marriage is my relationship with my husband, my family is my relationship with both my son and husband. SQ is a relationship I have more difficulty with. And it’s most certainly NOT because it’s a relationship between two women. (I would love OUAT to explore a same gender relationship, but with two people who love each other, not 2 pieces of canon relationships, or even unrequited love – ie: Aurora and Mulan. But that’s a tangent for a different day/thread!) SQ is the definition of dysfunctional – ALL of Emma’s misery and scars can be traced back to one person – Regina (Ok, some argue not Regina, but Rumple, but I disagree with that assessment.) Regina ripped Emma away from her parents, caused Emma to grow up feeling worthless and alone…and Emma’s supposed to fall in love with Regina? Um…
Luckily, the haters have just reached a point of ridiculousness. I tend to tune out when the whole rape culture thing gets going – and that means arguments made against Hook or Neal and Emma, or Regina and Graham. Because I think it takes reading a LOT into these situations to go from what we’ve been shown and running around in circles shouting “RC! RC! RC!” And I don’t believe it was ever A&E’s intention to suggest any of these relationships were about rape. Studying this topic in college (Communications major, focus on film/tv theory here) there was one example that was always brought up – General Hospital and the marriage of Luke and Laura (and god, am I dating myself here – but I was only 2 when the actual event was shown on tv!!). If you don’t know the reference, long story short Luke raped (like actual rape, not innuendo or heart-stealing-so-she-was-a-rapist nonsense) Laura…then they fell in love, got married and had a couple of kids. And when the marriage was shown on tv, it broke viewership records. People were OBSESSED with Luke and Laura. The whole he raped her bit pretty much got swept under the rug. This is NOT what we’re seeing in OUAT between any of the characters. So as I have huge problems with my Luke & Laura example, I also have huge problems with people throwing around terms like ‘rape’ and ‘rape culture’ or even ‘stalker’, etc in regard to any of the OUAT characters – because 1) nothing has been established in canon and 2) Rape, and ‘rape culture’ is far to important a topic to use it as part of an agenda to denounce or support your favorite fictional characters on a tv show. Sorry – enough of that – end rant!
Onto more positive topics before I end my novel here (hey, 3 days away, right?! 🙂 ) as far as our dear couple goes, I’m loving what we’re getting. Not much is particularly surprising (I refer you back to the ‘we understand these characters’ comments previously brought up) but it is all very in line with what I expect from this couple. One step forward, 2 steps back. Hook supporting Emma, Emma admitting she’s afraid to lose him (HOW HUGE IS THAT?!) – and hopefully, as many suspect, an identity crisis with Hook and Emma taking on the role of supporter in their relationship. I’m still a little on the fence with EM/Ice Queen but I’m loving the Frozen stuff. Almost all of Kristoff’s stuff in the last episode had me either cracking up or squeeing over his attempts to handle his handful of a soon-to-be sister-in-law! And this episode – I think it just might kill us all!! Bring it on – less than 24 hours now!!!
October 19, 2014 at 12:08 am #286067In reply to: The Captain Swan thread!
surayya
ParticipantWhat haters think Killian is like to Emma: I’m controlling and I’m abusive, so I’ll follow you around because I’m creepy and a stalker.
What Killian is actually like to Emma: I know you push people away because you think they’ll eventually leave you. I will not be that person for you. I will be by your side no matter what because your problems are my problems and I never want you to feel alone ever again.
http://swanismycaptain.tumblr.com/post/100340274997/what-haters-think-killian-is-like-to-emma-im
Yep, this about sums it up doesnt it
Anybody who thinks Killian is “Bad” & is “Bad” for Emma 1) Doesnt understand Killian/Hook as a character at all 2) Needs to take off their hater/shipper goggles & take in how Killian/Hook is actually written & portrayed 2) Absolutely doesnt understand Emma as a character at all 3) Is missing some of the point of one of the core concepts of the show & 3) Need to pull their personal lives out of a fictional fantasy show & start seeing it as the entertainment it is & Not as some sort of weird guide on how to live their life- this isnt reality TV lol.Yeah…and I’m sure I’ve said it before, but it’s not like Emma ever actually asked him to leave her alone or go away; she often asked for his help or just wanted him around. And she did knee him in the groin once, when she didn’t remember him, so we know that she’s not at all afraid to express her negative feelings if she has them.
And I think I’ve said this before too (sorry…) but I get the distinct impression that for other Emma ships, Emma is really just a prop to make their favorite character happy. I see lots of whining about Emma and how they’ve changed her whole character (because she’s obviously either a lesbian with a crush on the woman who ruined her life and has tried to kill her multiple times or still hung up on the man who left her pregnant and in jail for his crimes). I mean, obviously I love Hook, but I love Emma just as much, if not more. I like them together because they make each other happy (and they have great chemistry), not because it’s just what Hook wants. And I’m so looking forward to finally getting more of Emma’s history this season!
Agree with you totally!
October 18, 2014 at 11:18 pm #286058In reply to: The Captain Swan thread!
Epona_610
ParticipantWhat haters think Killian is like to Emma: I’m controlling and I’m abusive, so I’ll follow you around because I’m creepy and a stalker.
What Killian is actually like to Emma: I know you push people away because you think they’ll eventually leave you. I will not be that person for you. I will be by your side no matter what because your problems are my problems and I never want you to feel alone ever again.
http://swanismycaptain.tumblr.com/post/100340274997/what-haters-think-killian-is-like-to-emma-im
Yep, this about sums it up doesnt it
Anybody who thinks Killian is “Bad” & is “Bad” for Emma 1) Doesnt understand Killian/Hook as a character at all 2) Needs to take off their hater/shipper goggles & take in how Killian/Hook is actually written & portrayed 2) Absolutely doesnt understand Emma as a character at all 3) Is missing some of the point of one of the core concepts of the show & 3) Need to pull their personal lives out of a fictional fantasy show & start seeing it as the entertainment it is & Not as some sort of weird guide on how to live their life- this isnt reality TV lol.Yeah…and I’m sure I’ve said it before, but it’s not like Emma ever actually asked him to leave her alone or go away; she often asked for his help or just wanted him around. And she did knee him in the groin once, when she didn’t remember him, so we know that she’s not at all afraid to express her negative feelings if she has them.
And I think I’ve said this before too (sorry…) but I get the distinct impression that for other Emma ships, Emma is really just a prop to make their favorite character happy. I see lots of whining about Emma and how they’ve changed her whole character (because she’s obviously either a lesbian with a crush on the woman who ruined her life and has tried to kill her multiple times or still hung up on the man who left her pregnant and in jail for his crimes). I mean, obviously I love Hook, but I love Emma just as much, if not more. I like them together because they make each other happy (and they have great chemistry), not because it’s just what Hook wants. And I’m so looking forward to finally getting more of Emma’s history this season!
October 18, 2014 at 11:01 pm #286055In reply to: The Captain Swan thread!
surayya
ParticipantWhat haters think Killian is like to Emma: I’m controlling and I’m abusive, so I’ll follow you around because I’m creepy and a stalker.
What Killian is actually like to Emma: I know you push people away because you think they’ll eventually leave you. I will not be that person for you. I will be by your side no matter what because your problems are my problems and I never want you to feel alone ever again.
Yep, this about sums it up doesnt it 😉
Anybody who thinks Killian is “Bad” & is “Bad” for Emma 1) Doesnt understand Killian/Hook as a character at all 2) Needs to take off their hater/shipper goggles & take in how Killian/Hook is actually written & portrayed 2) Absolutely doesnt understand Emma as a character at all 3) Is missing some of the points of the core concepts of the show & 4) Need to pull their personal lives out of a fictional fantasy show & start seeing it as the entertainment it is & Not as some sort of weird guide on how to live their life- this isnt reality TV lol.October 18, 2014 at 10:45 pm #286054In reply to: The Captain Swan thread!
surayya
Participant
#this is the face of a man who spent 300 years in hell fulfilling by hate and revenge #realizing that he matters to someone #and this someone happens to be his love #the woman he traded his ship for #he’s fucking realizing that someone – EMMA SWAN – cares about him #about his safety #about his life #this is Killian Jones realizing that he matters to Emma Swan #let me die in peace plsAbout this date tomorrow night…
Tomorrow night we’ll be seeing these two going on a real date.These two broken hearts, damaged heroes,
who started out fighting eachother,
are now worried about and kissing eachother.
They’re trusting eachother with their hearts and it’s beautiful to watch.
This episode is a very important step for Emma Swan, for Killian Jones, for their journey to true love.
❝ I didn’t like my name
until you said it. ❞
Swan was the name of the family that adopted Emma for a short time when she was a little girl. The Swans were probably the first to make Emma feel like she belonged, like she had a home, like she was loved, like she wasn’t an orphan anymore. But then they had their own baby and had given her up and she was an orphan again. Swan is a weight that Emma carries, a reminder of something she had and then lost. But when Killian calls her “Swan,” he says it with such reverence, with adoration. From his lips, I imagine her name doesn’t spark those painful memories. From his lips, I think “Swan” gives her strength.
For Killian, on the other hand, he’s been “Captain Hook” for centuries. His real name is a reminder of the man he was, the man of honor, the man who wanted to be a hero and went by a code of good form, the man he thought had died along with Liam and Milah. But he’s trying so hard to be that man again, to be good; and I feel like each time Emma calls him by his true name he is assured that he’s on the right track. That, underneath the pirate exterior, she can see the man he truly is. The name is no longer a painful memory, but a hopeful reminder of the good man – the one so driven by and full of love – that still exists.
http://neverlandspirate.tumblr.com/post/100198614022/i-didnt-like-my-name-untilOctober 18, 2014 at 10:28 pm #286050In reply to: The Captain Swan thread!
surayya
Participantboyfriendhook:
(1.01) October 23rd, Emma’s first appearance/her birthday.
(2.04) October 21st, Hook’s first episode.
(2.05) October 28th, Emma and Hook first meet.
(3.05) October 27th, Hook and Emma’s first kiss.
(4.04) October 19th, Hook and Emma’s first date
http://captainswansource.tumblr.com/post/100332596767/boyfriendhook-1-01-october-23rd-emmas-first
Seems like October is a big month for CS 😉
http://thejeweloftherealm.tumblr.com/post/100363121873/captain-swan-the-princess-bride
http://piratessavior.tumblr.com/post/100246839715/of-course-i-trust-you
October 18, 2014 at 9:54 pm #286046In reply to: Emma + Baelfire = Swanfire
RumplesGirl
Keymaster@DSB
I read this twice and it was really beautiful. I firmly believe that they were heading for SF reunion in 322. It was supposed to be Neal and Emma in the past–with Henry–getting home. It’s literally what the story has always been. At some point they they made a change that gutted their story.
I wish I could be as optimistic as you. I really do. I won’t get into why I think optimism is basically moot at this point. We all know my views and you wrote such a pretty thing.
But one point: as to the going to lunch date as HERSELF— so much contrast with how she is dressed for Hook’s date!! I mean omg. She’s in a dress that is NOT Emma Swan. Emma Swan is not a girly girl. When we first met her, she was in a skin tight bright red-y pink-y dress that screamed sex and power, not girly and virginity. In other words, she’s not being herself for him. And it’s TROUBLING. Like….beyond troubling
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"October 18, 2014 at 9:44 pm #286044In reply to: Emma + Baelfire = Swanfire
dontstopbelievin
ParticipantI would hate for Emma to become Milah 2.0 although theoretically it would make sense if that was Hook’s intention. Hook has been
When a couple starts to change so much to make a relationship work, I think the relationship is doomed to fail. Hook looks at Emma and thinks of the adventure they had together climbing the beanstalk. He told Emma then she’d make one heck of a pirate. Emma, by contrast, is looking for stability, for roots, and for belonging. She has said several times she can never just sit back and relax so long as she’s the savior, because something bad is constantly happening to her. That is why Emma so enjoyed her normal life with Henry in NYC–away from all the madness of Stroybrooke. She identifies the town as home now because that is where her mom and dad are located, but she still feels the weight of the world on her shoulders. She still is that reluctant savior of sorts. Even though she’s trying to reconcile with that role by trying to give everyone their happy ending, she still hinted in 3×12 that her idea of a happy ending was not being the savior.To me, that is a big reason why Neal and Emma made so much more sense together than Emma and Hook ever did. Neal came to A Land Without Magic to escape “all that crap” that his dad put him through. Emma came her as an infant, without any choice in the matter, but as a result is used to our world. She and Neal were both so adapted to the real world that coming back into SB was sort of like culture shock. Emma and Neal were both in the element living in the Big City, doing a normal 9 to 5 job, and were happy. Emma had Henry. Neal had Tamara (before he discovered she was playing him). To me, it’s still a big thing that Emma chose to end up in Neal’s hometown due to a fire. Why write that in except to show how similar Emma and Neal were? To show that Emma and Neal’s concept of home was in sync, that their lives would’ve blended seamlessly together, whether in NYC or SB.
When I get caught in the trap of trying to analyze the show – a fool’s errand at this point, which frustrates me to no end, because I LOVE looking at what they set up through 1 and even 2 into the long term – I have to remind myself that there’s a line. 410/411/412 were set up very clearly for a SF reunion. The missed lunch – think “An Affair to Remember” – and “I’ll see you both again.” Sending her to Neal’s city, Charley’s Girl, sending her to Neal’s apartment, etc.
But the danger, IMO, comes from when we try to pull anything from pre-314 and apply it to post-314. I still maintain that the hinge comes on that nightmare of Charming’s in 314 – that’s where the shift happened. The only thing that remains confusing to me is why they continued to string along the parallels throughout the rest of 3B: the parallel scenes in 314 and 315 (“I’m glad” vs “I’m sorry” about Walsh,) Henry asking about the keys to steal the car, the apartment near the water, etc. I remain stymied about 321-2; why make the hero of the CS movie the dead guy who comprised the opposite side of the triangle? The whole thing remains so bizarre to me, so bizarre in fact that I cannot spend too much time pondering it because I literally RAGE.
I read something really interesting on tumblr recently that I’d never considered, about how much *Hook* has had to change in order to pursue Emma. Being a fan of Emma’s and not a fan of Hook’s, I’d always considered it from her POV but the post made some excellent points. My shipment of SF has so very much to do with the extraordinarily clear setup of their story – lost boy & lost girl, kids from a magical realm finding each other in the LWM, etc etc. One of the things that I LOVE about them is that they’re so real-world in the midst of the fairytale; it’s the real-life fairytale that was kind of the goal of Once.
I still maintain that Emma’s happy ending simply cannot be Captain Hook. (Although, perhaps that’s not so much an issue anymore, is it. Even avoiding spoilers, it’s hard to miss that one lol.) Maybe it’s simply so that I don’t go insane, but I am choosing to believe this is just a temporary thing (I don’t want to say short-term as that’s subjective, but I still maintain this is not the canoical end of the show.) I am definitely keeping an eye on how they handle OQ though, since I think that’s the template, and in all honesty they’re doing a terrible job, which makes me second-guess myself. But because I’m trying my darndest to be able to keep watching the show, I’m going to continue to hold onto my delusion that there has been too much deliberate setup to not bring the whole thing crashing down at some point.
And it’s just… yeah. We’ve seen very very few REAL grinning smiles out of Emma in the 3+ seasons – they’ve been (mostly? all?) for Neal. There is NO one else who gets the joke of, “I almost married a flying monkey.” They wrote this character to be Emma’s perfect counterpart and there’s no matter of rewriting, analysis or insistence from the writers that will make someone else a better match for her. But for me, when I get into the “why did they…” it gets dangerous, because if it’s pre-314 the valid answer IS “because they were heading for SF.” It’s why they had her move to NYC because of a *fire* in Boston, why she had Charley’s Girl on the stereo, why she spent those first few episodes back in SB, “Where’s Neal? Where’s Neal? Where’s Neal?” His death was absolute whiplash because it was absolute whiplash – it was clear they decided to kill him very quickly and just abandoned the story midstream. If they’d done it at 311, it would have made sense. It still doesn’t make sense to me why they didn’t take the latter half of 3B and write CS to make it better, to make it make sense, instead having Hook be the creepy stalker that polarized their fanbase, but I’m just a viewer, what do I know?
I think I’ve rambled off point, repeating things I’ve said a thousand times before. Anyways. Yeah, both halves of CS are having to change in order to make the relationship work – just looking at the promos for 404 makes that evident. LOOK at them, they are both ENTIRELY different characters. Contrast? Look at Emma when she was heading to her not-a-date lunch with Neal; jeans and her jacket – herself. If you have to change who you are to make a relationship work, it’s not right for you. And I don’t mean “be the best version of yourself,” but becoming someone totally different, suppressing who you really are, stepping not just out of your comfort zone but out of your own skin? It’s not right. Even if we take away all of the frightening creepy/stalker/date rape implications of CS, at its core it’s a forced pairing. He’s chosen Emma because he’s single-minded and set his sights on her; she’s chosen him because there’s no other choices left. Those are HORRIBLE reasons to choose a life’s partner, outside of all of the other reasons the relationship is terrifying.
People in relationships need to bend, need to compromise, need to meet in the middle. But when you have impassible differences it’ll simply never work. And what sort of crack the writer’s room was smoking when they decided, “We’re going to go with the half of the triangle that wants totally different things out of life, instead of the half that was written as each others’ counterparts,” I have no idea. It must be some good stuff. Maybe if they shared, watching the show would be more palatable. 😉 (I kid. Don’t do drugs, folks.)
Urgh. Ramble. Sorry.
Cause this story needs some mending & a better happy ending...
October 18, 2014 at 9:41 pm #286043In reply to: The Captain Swan thread!
surayya
ParticipantAll the proper smooches so far 🙂
Hmm, I just noticed the pattern of the softer/more tender kisses have Killian on the left & Emma on the right, while the more passionately charged kisses have Emma on the left & Killian on the right ….I wonder if it’s pure coincidence or the beginnings of a pattern…here’s hoping another kiss will feature tomorrow & answer that very question 🙂
Both of these kisses are so beautiful because both are meant to be reassuring.
The first one is Emma letting her walls down, reassuring him that she’ll get there, if he’s patient with her, if he waits for her a little longer. That she’ll just have to sort a few things out before she can fully commit to what they have. And she knows he will wait because he’s always shown up for her and waited for her in the past.
The second one is Killian reassuring Emma that he’ll never leave her. She’s lost everyone she’s ever been with and she’s so vulnerable in this moment because she can’t bear the thought of losing him too, but this is Killian Jones, the pirate who managed to survive more than 300 years to avenge the death of his first love and now he’s going to survive for Emma and his love for her.
http://mintchocotea.tumblr.com/post/100267643145
& the humorous 😉
There are 2 more of Killy & Emma, but wont post them in all their glory here- each contains a single ‘naughty’ word 😉
-
AuthorSearch Results